Fiction: Gwenda Bond
November 25, 202400:31:45

Fiction: Gwenda Bond

Gwenda Bond has written across a range of genres and media, alone and collaboratively, and for licensed properties including Lois Lane and Stranger Things. This week, we discuss the value of constraints and the joy of finding that one reader who connects with the story you're trying to tell.


Links:


Credits:

[00:00:09] Welcome to Ten Thousand. I'm your host Ben Scofield, and this is a podcast about expertise.

[00:00:13] It isn't about experts though, it's about the journey. My goal with Ten Thousand is to talk to

[00:00:18] people at all stages, from absolute novices to world-class performers, to find out how they

[00:00:21] think about what they do and what it means to excel, and especially how what they think changes

[00:00:24] as they get more experience. With that said, let's get into it. I read a lot of fiction,

[00:00:34] but sadly it takes people a really long time to write a book, which means I'm often taking chances

[00:00:39] on authors I haven't seen before, and usually that works out great. But it also means that

[00:00:43] when I see an author whose work I really enjoy branching out into a new genre or a new medium,

[00:00:47] I get really, really excited. This week I'm joined by just such an author. Gwenda Bond has published,

[00:00:52] starting out mostly in young adult fantasy with series like the Cirque American trilogy,

[00:00:57] but then moved into middle grade fiction for a bit, and then more recently romantic comedies like

[00:01:02] the Match Made in Hell duology and Mr. and Mrs. Witch, licensed properties with the Lois Lane

[00:01:07] trilogy and the first novel written in the Stranger Things world, scripted podcasts,

[00:01:12] audiobook originals, and most recently the frame-up, about which I should say I love a good magical

[00:01:17] heist. So definitely check that out if you also love a good magical heist. So Gwenda,

[00:01:21] welcome to 10,000. Thanks so much for having me. Yeah. So I'm really excited to talk about the breadth

[00:01:29] of your experience and the more unusual ways in which you've worked. But before we get to that,

[00:01:33] I always start with, what does good mean in the context of writing fiction?

[00:01:38] Oh, well, that's what an easy question. To me, good, I mean, when you're telling a story,

[00:01:44] you're trying to connect with a reader. But the thing that's tricky is that doesn't mean you're

[00:01:50] going to connect with every reader, no matter how good the story is. So to me, the way that I gauge

[00:01:55] whether I've done my job is if one reader seems to have read the book that I wanted to write,

[00:02:01] I'm like, okay, nailed it. And hopefully that there are more of them. You know, it's just like

[00:02:08] you or I walk into a bookstore and we know there's lots of good books that we won't particularly connect

[00:02:13] with. And so I think it's figuring out like, who are the readers that you would speak to?

[00:02:18] And then trying to tell a story in a way that they will respond to.

[00:02:22] Okay. So then I guess the next question is, how? So you've worked in different genres and

[00:02:29] different media, like I mentioned.

[00:02:30] Yeah, I believe they call that a deletone. Like, follow my whims wherever they take me.

[00:02:36] Yeah. So do you find that that sort of metric of success is the same across all of those? Or are

[00:02:44] there sort of unique aspects for working in a primarily audio medium versus the written word?

[00:02:49] There are definitely differences between, to me, that metric, the metric of whether I've done my

[00:02:56] job or not, like the one reader who gets it is like a sanity saving device. I think it was Seth

[00:03:03] Godin I heard on a podcast once talking about how there are the business metrics for success,

[00:03:10] especially in publishing. I think a lot of people get hung up on those, which are very much not

[00:03:15] really in the author's control. And to me, it's really important. This was something I borrowed

[00:03:21] from him. Like he was talking about how he decided to redefine what success for each of his books was

[00:03:27] for him to sort of divorce it from those parts that were more frustrating sometimes. So that to me is,

[00:03:34] they're two separate things. Like I can recognize a book did well commercially or a project didn't

[00:03:40] perform as well as I wanted and still feel like it was an artistic success. And we did what we wanted

[00:03:46] to do. I think the big difference for me is whether it's a collaborative project or not.

[00:03:50] And so for collaborative projects and individual projects, I think the metrics change a little bit

[00:03:57] just because one, to me, a collaborative project is really about responsibility of the team

[00:04:04] and working toward that story together. And it's almost like a breath of fresh air because you get

[00:04:11] to work with the energy of other people in a way that you don't when you're in your garret until you come

[00:04:17] out and maybe your editor is there waiting, like, please give me a book and I'll help you fix it.

[00:04:23] Nice. Yeah. So most of the other authors I've talked to for the series are writing on their own.

[00:04:30] And I think everyone, almost everyone has talked about the importance of their writing groups and

[00:04:36] the feedback they get. But one of the other interviews was with Andrea Phillips, who I know

[00:04:41] you worked with. Yeah. I love her. Yeah. What a genius she is. She's amazing. But so you work together

[00:04:50] at Cereal Box now, Real Media, in a much different way of working. So you said that the measure of

[00:04:57] success working on your own was the story you wanted to tell connected with the reader. So

[00:05:03] where does the story you're trying to tell with that sort of collaboration come from?

[00:05:08] Well, that was a particularly interesting project that was remade. And I jumped in to replace someone

[00:05:15] who had to leave. So I wasn't there for the initial genesis of the story. I kind of came in late.

[00:05:22] But I have to say, it was a great group to come into. And they really did let me jump in and change

[00:05:28] some things, including some core romantic relationships that had been in the works the

[00:05:34] whole time. And they're like, no, that's interesting that you're seeing this chemistry between these

[00:05:38] two. Let's go down that path. One thing I will say, every time you do a project with a group,

[00:05:46] you learn, everyone's good at different things. And every time I've been lucky enough to work

[00:05:52] collaboratively like that, I've learned something. And for that one, to me, it was kind of learning

[00:05:56] how to write short stories, which is not my natural bed. And so each episode is basically the length of

[00:06:01] a short story. And I also really enjoyed the writer's room process that we did for those. And we did the

[00:06:07] same thing for Dead Air, like the story summit where everyone comes together and then you're making

[00:06:13] decisions and interrogating and shaping the story together as you go. And then of course, everyone

[00:06:18] breaks off with their little pieces. And that's kind of where you've got time to make more idiosyncratic

[00:06:24] choices. And of course, claiming the episode. So I definitely feel like for those, to me, it's like,

[00:06:31] are we all excited about what we're producing? Like in a way, it's like, is everyone learning from each

[00:06:38] other and getting something out of it and feeling like we're expanding what we can do together. And I

[00:06:45] mean, Dead Air was the same way. Like, I feel incredibly lucky. That was the one I created for

[00:06:50] Cereal Box and then Realm. And I'm not sure. I wish we had managed to get it packaged the way we wrote

[00:06:57] it, which is that we did the mystery behind the story. And we did the podcast episodes that the person's

[00:07:04] actually producing. And we did a lot of tricky misdirects and hints between the two. But for

[00:07:11] whatever reason, they never really got packaged like we envisioned it. But I learned so much getting

[00:07:18] to work with Rachel Cain, Roxanne Conrad, who then passed away a couple years after that, and Carrie

[00:07:24] Ryan, who is just like a plot master. And so I think those are the things that I'm thinking of when I go into

[00:07:32] a collaboration is also like, how is this going to improve and expand what I can do? And can I bring

[00:07:39] anything to it? Because if I can't bring something to it, I would say no. And it's the same for IP.

[00:07:44] Like if I'm offered an IP and I don't feel that I immediately have a way to understand the essence of

[00:07:52] that world, that property, and that I can bring something to it while also meeting the existing

[00:08:00] demands, then I'm like, this isn't for me. Yeah. So, so with licensed work in general,

[00:08:06] you have a story you want to tell. And then the brand has things that they want out of it.

[00:08:12] How does that combine to be successful versus how can it go wrong?

[00:08:16] So I've been very lucky in that I have had almost universally positive experiences with this,

[00:08:22] with one exception. But Warner Brothers, I have had a good experience with on the Lois Lane side.

[00:08:28] Like I was given a ton of freedom and really, honestly, like very, very much they were supportive

[00:08:36] of the vision that I had. And really, honestly, Lois's backstory is so unfleshed out that I had a

[00:08:45] lot of freedom there. I mean, they were super worried until the first draft came in and there

[00:08:50] were some like big things that I changed. And I still, I'm always joke that I was the person they

[00:08:55] could afford. Because honestly, I do feel like that project was the project I've been training for my

[00:09:00] whole life, how it fell in my lap the way it did when I was barely established. I'll never understand,

[00:09:05] but I'm grateful for it. As I was a journalism major in college, my day job for many years was

[00:09:11] working with reporters. But I always loved Superman and Lois Lane. Like I'm printing on that character

[00:09:17] early on. And I'm like, I really developed that book, like the idea, the core idea in the universe

[00:09:24] for those books in about a week. And that's the same for Stranger Things. Like I feel like if I'm

[00:09:29] approached about a property and I can immediately start making choices that feel right and feel right in

[00:09:39] terms of, I think where IP goes wrong is you have to understand what the essence of the thing that makes

[00:09:48] people love it is. And I feel like Superman seems to be really hard for a lot of people to understand.

[00:09:55] Like they want to be like, but what if Superman was this? And it's like, but he's not. That's the point.

[00:10:01] Um, you know, and so I feel like if you can define like the two or three things that make the story

[00:10:08] universe without which it's not going to feel like a Superman story. And for me, those are like

[00:10:13] ensemble cast commitment to truth and science fiction. I mean, cause he's an alien. And I feel

[00:10:21] like those things, then you jump off from there. And, but it's like, give Lois her own Scooby gang,

[00:10:27] stranger things, same thing. Although, you know, in that case, of course the brand,

[00:10:31] has a very firm idea of what the brand is. But in that case, again, basically they were like,

[00:10:36] we want someone to tell the story of Eleven's mother. We want it to be set in 1969. We want

[00:10:43] it to be about the experiment. Other than that, pitch us. You can have the freedom to decide who

[00:10:48] Eleven's dad is. You just got to get him off the, off the stage by the end of the book somehow.

[00:10:54] I mean, honestly, so in both those cases, I feel like I've had the best case scenario where

[00:10:59] they actually were interested in hiring me to tell a story in that world. And they let me do it,

[00:11:06] which is not always the case. And for the Lois Lane books, I remember we sent, I had two editors,

[00:11:12] an editor at Capstone and then an editor at Warner Brothers. And I remember my editor and I were like,

[00:11:17] well, we hope that they love this book for the Lois Lane book. Cause it was really the first time DC

[00:11:22] had ever done something quite like this with this character. And they were nervous. It was really

[00:11:27] one of the first novels and the editor sent back his stuff in a hard copy. And he drew a heart on the

[00:11:34] front of the manuscript. And the, and the only global note was Superman could not do anything illegal.

[00:11:43] But like, like, but like there were like, like he drew hearts like all throughout the margins.

[00:11:48] We're like, okay, I think we did. I think we did it. Yeah. Yeah. I wonder if, I mean,

[00:11:55] the people who work on these shows are often, and these properties, they love the properties, right?

[00:11:59] Exactly. Right.

[00:12:00] So, so when you're able to do justice to the characters, then they're going to be happy.

[00:12:06] Right.

[00:12:07] So, so clearly there are some stories or some elements of stories you can't tell there,

[00:12:13] right? Right.

[00:12:13] Was that constraint, do you think helpful or did it make it harder?

[00:12:18] I think constraints are always helpful. And I should say, by the way, the one negative

[00:12:22] experience with IP that I had, uh, just to make it clear, cause somebody will be like,

[00:12:27] is it wild cards? No wild cards is great. George R. Martin's a fabulous editor.

[00:12:31] It was actually another announced and then canceled immediately project that people still ask me

[00:12:37] about. It was going to be a cereal box flash show and it was all written. And there was a

[00:12:44] competing project that no one knew about inside Warner Brothers. And so they're like, oh, we

[00:12:50] didn't know that this was happening. So we got to cancel this.

[00:12:53] But to your point, I think constraints to me, um, are one of the most useful things writers

[00:12:59] can have. And I definitely have learned things like I was never an outliner, really a planner

[00:13:06] before doing IP because you have to be, um, not only because they want you to turn in a detailed

[00:13:14] outline, but because it protects you. If you can convey what they can expect to get out of

[00:13:20] you, I've often found that, and this is true of original work too, where writers get into trouble

[00:13:26] is when they deviate from what the publisher expects. And that can be a good thing. It can

[00:13:32] be a necessary thing. And it happens in original work too. If you sell on proposal and then the book

[00:13:38] turns out to be something completely different, it can lead to some nightmare scenarios. And I feel

[00:13:42] like with IP, you're in an even worse position if that happens because they can just be like,

[00:13:48] we hired you to do this and you did this. So now you fix it because you don't have the final say.

[00:13:55] Um, I think it's very important that you, when you make choices that you're not just doing

[00:14:01] something to make it different, but actually improving upon it. And so if a choice that I'm

[00:14:07] making up front makes me excited to go further down a path, those are the choices I'm going to make.

[00:14:12] And I want as many constraints as possible. Now I do like melding a bunch of genres to make it

[00:14:17] interesting and difficult. Like all of my projects are, I guess what you'd call cross genre

[00:14:21] because I read and consume stories across genres and that's just the way my brain works,

[00:14:26] but it can make things tricky like writing a magic heist book where the heist has to work both with

[00:14:32] the rules of the magic side of the world and with our, our world. Um, but it felt like it would be

[00:14:37] cheating to get rid of either one.

[00:14:39] Yeah. A couple of the conversations I've had have, uh, I've talked to folks about tropes

[00:14:45] and sort of how far you can go. So you were talking about, you can't deviate from the expectations of

[00:14:52] the publisher, but also, I mean, to your original definition of good and success is you, to some

[00:14:57] extent, you can't deviate too much from the expectations of the audience. Right. Um, uh, so, uh, I,

[00:15:04] I got on a romance kick, uh, a few years ago and, uh, a lot of romance is extremely formulaic.

[00:15:10] And I mean, the, I think some people would argue that the defining feature of the romance is the

[00:15:14] happily ever after at the end. So I have to stick to these specific trips. I'm running in enemies to

[00:15:19] lovers or whatever it happens to be. Um, so, so how do you balance when to follow the constraints

[00:15:27] or where these are more soft constraints, right? So when to follow them or subvert them or,

[00:15:33] or do something completely different? Um, for me, I'm always looking for like, let's take Mr.

[00:15:41] and Mrs. Witch as an example, because most people are familiar with the movie, Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

[00:15:45] And this was literally one of those random things where I was watching Mr. and Mrs. Smith during the

[00:15:49] pandemic. And I was like, what if it was a witch and a witch hunter and like almost fully formed

[00:15:54] book idea? It's like, well, this would be too fun not to write. Um, and so what I want to do then

[00:16:01] is bring my own perspective and unique twist to the lore and the world of the book and to the

[00:16:14] characters. You know, I want to use these things that everyone finds enjoyable, but I want to have

[00:16:21] a woman who people on Instagram think just as wearing a snake wig, who is actually a necromancer with,

[00:16:29] with snakes for hair and you know, who feeds them sushi after a hard day at work, which you can't

[00:16:36] actually feed them nigiri. It has to be sashimi. I did the research snakes, no rice for snakes,

[00:16:43] but that kind of world building that, uh, really I'm sure everyone's glad I'm out here doing, but, um,

[00:16:51] but like for me, it's, it's, it's interesting. And also I think it depends on what you're,

[00:16:55] where you're writing. And like right now I'm working on the first in a trilogy of historical

[00:17:01] romances that are fantasy Regencies. So I want to keep the parts of the Regencies that I love,

[00:17:08] but also I've made this huge fantasy world. Um, and, and it just gets more and more detailed as I go on,

[00:17:16] but still using some of those things because I know as a reader that this is what gives me pleasure

[00:17:22] in that type of story. And so I think part of it is just connecting with why are you telling this

[00:17:28] story? And if you, if you honor the parts you love and subvert the parts that drive you crazy,

[00:17:33] it's like a good rule of thumb. Um, it's probably going to resonate with other people,

[00:17:39] but especially for romance. I mean, romance writers are masters of emotional tension.

[00:17:46] The fact is that yes, they can be formulaic and they do all have a happy ever after,

[00:17:51] but also the best of them. And I would argue most of them, this is why it's such a popular genre,

[00:17:57] page turners that in and of itself tells you like the level of craft is very high.

[00:18:03] You know, a lot of books that I pick up, I'm not compelled to keep turning the pages and I put

[00:18:08] them down. Right. And I'm sure that's true for all of us. Um, and it's not that I'm saying that

[00:18:13] slow books are bad, but my favorite kinds of books are what I call meaning of life thrillers.

[00:18:18] And I think a lot of romances are actually meaning of life thrillers, um, in the sense that it's a,

[00:18:24] someone said not me and I can't remember who it is, but that every romance is an argument about love.

[00:18:30] And so I think there's a real intellectual component to what is this specific book saying?

[00:18:36] What is the romance between these two characters getting at on a deeper level?

[00:18:41] Hmm. Interesting. So I think there are, there are lots of ways that a story can connect with

[00:18:50] an audience. Um, and I think that that page turner versus slower book is that they almost feel distinct.

[00:18:58] Like there are at least two different ways that books can be really good. Um, I can read like R.F.

[00:19:04] Kwong's Babble. Absolutely. Great example. It's an amazing book, but it is dense.

[00:19:10] And you can't just turn pages through it. And that's one of the reasons, right. And that's part

[00:19:15] of the pleasure. Yeah. I think that's the thing is like slow books that realize the pleasure that

[00:19:20] readers want to revel in when they're reading a book like that. And there again, comes up to that

[00:19:26] thing of what's good is very much in the, of the beholder because, you know, I'm not a reader who

[00:19:31] necessarily wants to read the three page description of what's on the table at a feast.

[00:19:37] But certainly there are many people who've made long careers because people love those.

[00:19:44] Yeah. Or, or, uh, Ian Fleming going into the exact brands of the guns and the cars and all that.

[00:19:51] Right. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely.

[00:19:53] Yeah. Okay. Okay. So, so if the measure of good is connecting with the reader, then, uh, to some

[00:20:00] extent the feedback, right. I would say the right reader, like the reader that is the reader who's

[00:20:05] going to, it's connecting with the reader who is open to the story you want to tell.

[00:20:11] Okay. Um, so the feedback loop on that is pretty long. Yeah. So I I'm sitting in my office writing,

[00:20:17] uh, maybe I'm writing with other people if I'm very lucky. Um, we go through the publishing cycle

[00:20:22] and a year and a half later, it gets in the hands of a reader and it really connects or it doesn't.

[00:20:25] So how, how do you shorten that feedback cycle so you can get better at creating that story?

[00:20:31] Oh, that's a great question. I do think writing groups can be very useful. I've really only used

[00:20:38] mine when I'm stuck. I think to a certain extent you also develop your own, I guess gut is the,

[00:20:49] is, is really the best word for it, but it's almost like emotions in the body. Like I think you have a

[00:20:54] feeling when you're on the right track. And it's not that when I sit down, I'm even envisioning the

[00:21:00] reader on most days, but occasionally like I am aware that if I'm delighting myself with what I'm,

[00:21:07] I'm writing, I'm thinking this is going to delight someone else. And, um, and when that happens,

[00:21:14] it almost always is like the scenes that everyone shares, the little things that everyone pulls out.

[00:21:20] And so I think just becoming more attuned to those things over time in yourself, like your own

[00:21:28] emotions. I mean, I know it's kind of a cliche to say, write the book that you want to read because

[00:21:34] it's like, I want to read a book someone else wrote that I didn't have to do anything to make exist.

[00:21:41] But I do think there's something to write the book you want to write. And like a lot of people,

[00:21:46] I think maybe, I mean, and I'm not to say that every day you sit down, you're going to be like,

[00:21:50] this is great. I certainly just went through like a year long period where life events overwhelmed and

[00:21:57] I couldn't write or read really for the first time in my adult life. And it was terrifying,

[00:22:02] but you know, it came back like those things, they passed. But, um, I do think that coming back after

[00:22:12] a time away, I'm certainly more attuned to like one book I was writing and I had a good chunk of pages

[00:22:20] and they were good pages that I'd showed my editor and been like, this is a romantic comedy.

[00:22:26] And, but this was the version that I wrote like three years ago. And when I, I just kept not wanting

[00:22:32] to not going further, like something was clearly wrong. And I even asked like a couple of people,

[00:22:38] I was like, I'm going to send this to you to read, but then I never did because I would have had to edit it.

[00:22:41] And then all of a sudden I just started like having a conversation with another writer

[00:22:46] and asking questions. And now it is the horror book that I actually described, uh, when I was like,

[00:22:54] well, let's put this second book in. So sometimes your subconscious already told you this wasn't what

[00:22:59] you thought it was originally. And now it's fun. Now it's like fun to get into that world, develop it.

[00:23:06] Sometimes it's trying, it's figuring out like you're stalled because your subconscious knows that

[00:23:11] you are about to make a huge mistake. Gotcha. Okay. So when, when you started publishing,

[00:23:18] was your sense of what it meant to be writing good fiction the same, or has it changed over that time?

[00:23:24] Hmm. I mean, I think at core, it's always just about like trying to tell the story that's in your head.

[00:23:33] I do think that, um, when you are first publishing, not necessarily writing, but when you're first

[00:23:41] publishing, or even when you start showing your work to other people, there's a real curve. There's

[00:23:47] a learning curve that you have to go through to figure out like how vulnerable you are to voices of

[00:23:57] criticism getting in your head. And the first time that you publish something, you know, you're

[00:24:02] going to have, I mean, I mean, my first books were published during the heyday of hate reads on Goodreads.

[00:24:08] And so like the very first review that I ever got from a stranger was like laden with gifts and just

[00:24:17] like dragging the hell out of the book. And it was devastating. And like Kirkus had also panned the book,

[00:24:25] but then a lot of people I respected loved that book. And I'm still proud of it. Um, I'm sure there's a lot

[00:24:32] of things I would do differently about my first book now, but I, I think that you end up learning that like

[00:24:39] your work isn't for everyone and that's okay. Um, and so I think it really is just about sticking to your

[00:24:46] integrity of what you're trying to do. And that, that is, that has remained constant. Like I, you

[00:24:53] know, and I've always wanted my books to be quote unquote fun for the reader. Like I want them to be

[00:25:00] smart and fun and engaging and that has not wavered. And I, and that's something I carry across genres.

[00:25:08] Even for darker books, I still want them to be fun. Like in the sense that you want to pick it up,

[00:25:15] you want to spend time in that world, even if they're bad parts of it. Yeah. Um, so, so we talked

[00:25:23] a little bit at the beginning about working with other writers. Uh, I want to shift gears and talk

[00:25:28] about working with editors. Yeah. You, you have your sense of what it means for a work to be good.

[00:25:34] Um, do you find that that's the sense that editors also have, or are you, do you have to be lucky to

[00:25:40] get the editor whose sensibility matches up with yours or how does that happen? Well, I have been

[00:25:44] pretty, I again, have been lucky. I've worked with some great editors. I've only had a couple of,

[00:25:50] of, of nightmare scenarios. And in those cases, it wasn't so much that the editors were

[00:25:56] bad. It's that they were burned out. So I think that that's a, that's a real, that's a real thing.

[00:26:03] And like, I would never necessarily count it against them. They were going through a dark time.

[00:26:06] Um, working with editors is my favorite part of the process. It always has been. I much prefer

[00:26:12] revision to drafting. I find drafting pretty painful on the whole. And there's nothing like

[00:26:18] the gift of somebody that really learns your book as almost knows it as well as you do.

[00:26:26] And, um, but like I had an editorial call yesterday with my editor, my agent on this historical fantasy

[00:26:32] and the first draft I turned in, I knew needed to be completely ripped apart. Like I figured out

[00:26:37] the world and that was basically it and a couple of the characters. And so we had this call together

[00:26:43] and once they know that you're like, all right, let's go, let's figure out how to fix this. And

[00:26:49] that you're not just going to be weeping and being like, okay, I know this is going to be so much work.

[00:26:54] Like everyone can be more excited about it. And then my other editor, the editor on the frame up,

[00:27:00] uh, is my dream editor who was the only person we showed this book to, uh, and Grohl, who is a legend.

[00:27:06] And I wanted to work with her because I heard an interview with her at world fantasy when she was

[00:27:11] the editor guest of honor during the pandemic. And she just so clearly still loves and is excited

[00:27:17] by books and her job. And she's been doing this for decades. And I just was like, that's,

[00:27:25] that is someone I want to work with. And then through random events, it turned out, oh, it was mutual.

[00:27:31] Um, and, and, and we still had to give and take, but even just her notes on the proposal that I sent in

[00:27:38] that I submitted, I knew like, this is someone who can see what I'm trying to do more clearly than I can.

[00:27:47] And it really was so helpful. Um, and to feel you've got a partner in your editors. And I felt

[00:27:55] that with the Lois Lane editor, my editor for that book wrote this lovely essay you can still find

[00:28:00] on Tumblr. And she had her first daughter right when the book was coming out. And I really feel like

[00:28:07] editors don't get enough credit. Now I have heard horror stories. I've had friends who've gone through

[00:28:12] some terrible things. And I would say sometimes I feel like we're too afraid to just jump on the phone

[00:28:20] and have a conversation and be like, your suggestion here doesn't work for me. Let's figure out what

[00:28:25] will. Great. Yeah. Thank you. Um, I think we're almost at time. Was there anything that you would

[00:28:32] like to talk about that we didn't get to? Just the sense of that, you know, like the 10,000 hours

[00:28:38] concept, I think you're never not learning. I mean, I've said this many times jokingly, but it's true.

[00:28:45] The last 20% of every book that I write, I buy a book on how to write a book in a panic.

[00:28:50] It's so true. And then I will read it and I'll be like, I think I might be doing this. I think I may

[00:28:56] have almost written a book and it's very comforting, but you're never going to feel like an expert no matter

[00:29:03] how many times you've done this, but you do sort of get secure in your process. And also I think the

[00:29:09] biggest piece of advice that I always give people and I think it is figuring out the parts of your

[00:29:14] process that exist, even the ones that make you mad and you wish didn't and being honest about them.

[00:29:20] And if you are producing the work, then your process works for you. Stop trying to fight it.

[00:29:27] You know what I mean? Just embrace it. Learn to learn to love, hate your process.

[00:29:32] Yeah. If you're not writing, obviously you got to fix that or figure out like, am I burned out? Do

[00:29:38] I need time off? Have I taken a wrong turn or whatever? But, but I think like we're sadly,

[00:29:44] there are no 10,000 hours. It's just continuing education hours for the rest of your life.

[00:29:49] Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think one of the things I've discovered as I've talked to people across

[00:29:54] domains and at different stages is that you never stop like refining what expertise means.

[00:30:01] Right. So as a starting writer, maybe you are very focused on like story structure and what the,

[00:30:06] even the possibilities are for a point of view or whatever it happens to be like, they're very like

[00:30:11] technical level details. And then you sort of, you get those and you can move on to bigger and bigger

[00:30:16] and, and thinking much more about the audience who you want to connect with or the themes that you

[00:30:21] want to explore or whatever it happens to be. And that's the thing that keeps growing and evolving

[00:30:28] over time. So yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. And just always learning like new, I mean, I always want

[00:30:35] to be like doing new stuff, learning to tell stories in new ways. Yeah. Yeah. And I think that,

[00:30:41] that exploring different media and, and as much as maybe the rollout was botched on dead air,

[00:30:47] right. Interactions between in universe podcasts and the actual story that you're telling or some of

[00:30:54] the stuff that Andrea has done with transmedia and, and telling a single story across a bunch of

[00:30:59] different channels. Yes. Yeah. It's, I think the potential is sort of unlimited. It is. It's so

[00:31:05] exciting. No, I'm one of my oldest friends, Sean Stewart, whose novels I love, but who also has

[00:31:11] done a lot of the alternate reality gaming stuff. And I love listening to him talk and Andrea talk

[00:31:16] about stories because they just think of them in a totally different way. Yeah. Great. Well,

[00:31:22] thank you. This has been a fantastic discussion. I appreciate your time. Oh, thank you. Thank you.

[00:31:26] This was super fun. Thanks for listening. And thank you again to Gwenda Bond. That's a wrap for the

[00:31:31] fiction series, but there's more 10,000 to come. Join us again next week for another interview.