This week, we're talking to Chris Huisjen, who writes serial fiction online under the pseudonym Aest Belequa.
We discuss the difference between serialized fiction and traditional work, how he's built his writer's toolkit, the importance of receiving and, especially, providing feedback, and exploring themes and tropes.
Links:
- Aest Belequa on Royal Road
- Aest Belequa on Patreon
- Magical Girl Undergrad book 1: Heroics 101
- The Halcyon System
- Dungeon Tour Guide
- Scholomance book 1: A Deadly Education
Credits:
- Theme music: “Puzzle Pieces” by Lee Rosevere. Available for use under the CC BY 4.0 license, at Free Music Archive
[00:00:09] Welcome to Ten Thousand. I'm your host Ben Scofield and this is a podcast about expertise.
[00:00:13] It isn't about experts though, it's about the journey. My goal with Ten Thousand is to talk
[00:00:18] to people at all stages from absolute novices to world-class performers to find out how they
[00:00:21] think about what they do and what it means to excel and especially how what they think changes
[00:00:24] as they get more experience. With that said, let's get into it. So about a year and a half
[00:00:34] ago I found Royal Road online. It's a website kind of like Wattpad or Archive on our own a little bit
[00:00:40] where authors who are mainly independents are able to post their work from short stories and fanfic to
[00:00:45] serialized web novels, sometimes running to hundreds of thousands of words. Like there are some really
[00:00:49] long stories on there that are amazing and I've been reading there off and on ever since.
[00:00:54] This week I'm actually really excited to be talking to Chris Huisjen who goes by S. Bilequa who is one of
[00:00:59] the authors that I've enjoyed reading. I found Magical Girl Undergrad I guess a couple months ago just
[00:01:04] before it ended up the series run. So Chris has written a number of stories and series on Royal
[00:01:11] Road and published to Kindle Unlimited. Like I said Magical Girl Undergrad recently wrapped up
[00:01:16] and for the last five months or so I guess you started the Halcyon system which is your main
[00:01:21] work right now. Welcome to Ten Thousand. Thank you for having me.
[00:01:26] So what does good mean in the context of writing fiction for you?
[00:01:31] Um, so good in the context of writing fiction. Writing fiction is a lot like
[00:01:37] carpentry or basketball or any other skill that you pick up.
[00:01:41] I think in that like when you're looking at a professional athlete or a professional carpenter,
[00:01:48] there are all of these skills that you don't necessarily see. When you're looking at a finished
[00:01:55] work of fiction, you don't necessarily see all of the skills that are making it do what it does.
[00:02:01] But a beginning author or a beginning carpenter can take a hammer, nails, glue and a handsaw and
[00:02:08] they can build a basic cabinet. But the more tools you have and the more tools you've gotten mastered,
[00:02:13] the better that cabinet ends up turning out. So when I think about good fiction authors like Margaret
[00:02:22] Atwood or Sarah Moss or Stephen King, they've got a lot more tools in their toolkit that they can draw on.
[00:02:31] And so the process of becoming good at writing fiction is a lot more like
[00:02:39] slowly developing this toolkit.
[00:02:42] So concretely, like what sorts of things do you think go in the toolkit?
[00:02:47] So things that go in the toolkit, understanding how stories are put together structurally.
[00:02:54] Um, there's both chapter level structure, how an individual chapter works and how it ends on a,
[00:03:03] on a cliffhanger or producing a question that the reader asks.
[00:03:09] Like either I wonder how they're going to get out of this situation, or I wonder how that plan's going to work.
[00:03:16] Always leaving on that question of wonder.
[00:03:19] And then larger story level structure, rising tension, that process.
[00:03:27] But then there's also understanding how character arcs work, controlling tension across chapters,
[00:03:35] being able to ask questions or make the reader ask questions, and then being able to answer those questions
[00:03:43] through the book to build trust between the author and the reader.
[00:03:47] These are all very discreet skills.
[00:03:50] Sure. So, so when you're working in a serialized medium, I would imagine that some of the skills you need
[00:03:55] are different than you, than if you were contracted to write, you know, a full length novel from the beginning,
[00:04:00] where if I go to the bookstore and pick up a novel, the author may not have needed to have a cliffhanger
[00:04:06] or a direct question at the end of every chapter, because the, the readers like already committed,
[00:04:11] like they've already bought all 500 pages. Um, so what is the size of the difference in the sorts
[00:04:16] of skills or the, the, the balance of what you're using for working in different channels, I guess?
[00:04:23] So I'm part of an online writing group, mostly focused on serials, especially
[00:04:28] like the lit RPG progression fantasy stuff that's really popular on Royal Road.
[00:04:34] Oh, Hey, I wanted to pop in here during the edit to explain two of the terms that we used just now,
[00:04:39] and we'll be using a little bit later on. So progression fantasy is a genre in which a core,
[00:04:45] or maybe the core of the narrative is that the characters are increasing in power and ability.
[00:04:48] You might see explicit training montages and discussions of technique and practice,
[00:04:52] that sort of thing. Lit RPG on the other hand is a genre that fuses elements of role-playing games,
[00:04:57] like Baldur's Gate with the fiction, sometimes very deeply. So here you get things like magical
[00:05:02] or sci-fi systems with a capital S granting skills and ability scores and level ups to characters.
[00:05:07] In the narrative, you might see examples of status screens or, uh, characters might have inventories
[00:05:12] where they can store absurd amounts of material in an extra dimensional space,
[00:05:17] just like you would have in Final Fantasy or, uh, Dragon Age or Mass Effect or something like that.
[00:05:23] There is a lot of overlap here. Lit RPGs in particular are often also progression fantasies,
[00:05:28] where the characters are focused on getting explicitly more powerful and that increase is
[00:05:32] visible in the stats and the stat screens that you see in the narrative. Um, progression fantasy
[00:05:37] is broader though, and you can have progression fantasies that don't include anything like,
[00:05:41] like numerical values for your strength or intelligence. So with that in mind, let's keep going.
[00:05:48] Um, but a lot of the resources that we draw on for learning our skills are traditional fiction skills.
[00:05:57] I think we put a lot more emphasis on maintaining tension and never answering all the questions that
[00:06:04] we've made readers ask ending chapters on cliffhangers to try to get people to click the next chapter button.
[00:06:11] And ideally the Patreon link at the end of chapters as well. Right. Um, so I think there's more emphasis
[00:06:18] on that, but I don't think it's necessarily different skills than what a traditional author would use.
[00:06:23] When I read, uh, Scolamance, A Deadly Education by Naomi Novik last year,
[00:06:29] chapters were ending on cliffhangers, chapters were ending on the same kind of upbeats that
[00:06:35] we use in, in serial fiction. Some of that is it's how stories are written.
[00:06:42] Yeah. Yeah.
[00:06:44] Yeah. I wonder, I mean, so, so I think probably everybody has had the experience of picking up a
[00:06:49] well-regarded book that you can't put down, uh, versus a well-regarded book that
[00:06:56] you kind of have to put down every once in a while, right? Where some books are propulsive and some
[00:07:00] books are more meditative. I don't, yeah, maybe that's the right word. And, and serial fiction just
[00:07:07] naturally tends to be more propulsive, but it's not the only propulsive fiction that you can have.
[00:07:12] Correct. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think most of Naomi Novik's books are like that. Uh,
[00:07:16] I know the Temera series or her like Napoleonic wars with dragons stuff. Yeah. It was very much the same.
[00:07:23] Uh, and then at the end of the day you get, oh, they're going to China next time or, or whatever
[00:07:26] it happens to be. Like, so it just ramps up the stakes even more to make you want to pick it up.
[00:07:31] So. Right. And with traditional publishing, like the big cliffhangers happen at the end of books
[00:07:38] with web serials. A lot of the goal of the web serial is actually to make it to Amazon and to Kindle
[00:07:44] and audible. So those same big cliffhangers and big promises tend to, tend at book at the end of books as
[00:07:51] well. Yeah. So, so you have individual chapter or arcs essentially that reach a high point and then
[00:07:57] you cut off and then you want to do the same sort of fractally going up. Yeah. Yeah. Cool. Um,
[00:08:04] how do you and your writing group get better at doing that? With my writing group,
[00:08:10] there's not really any difference to me between like practice for fiction and the process of writing
[00:08:19] fiction. We're always doing the same kind of five things. So we read a lot both in our genre and out
[00:08:27] of our genre. Um, I'm working through several audio book series right now. And also I have four or five
[00:08:36] books that I need to get to on my shelf that, that are just fiction and they're fun and they're recommended
[00:08:42] by people in my writing group. Um, and then also reading or studying a lot of craft. Um, so craft
[00:08:50] books like, um, save the cat writes a novel is great for structure. Creating character arcs is great for
[00:08:55] understanding how characters work, but then also, um, Brandon Sanderson's lectures when he was at BYU in
[00:09:02] 2019, 2020 are really good. The writing excuses podcast has a ton of information and just finding
[00:09:09] sources of information, um, is kind of the second thing. But then we also talk constantly about
[00:09:17] things we're reading, whether that's craft or whether that's fiction or anything, there's a lot
[00:09:24] of conversation all the time. So that's the third thing is talking and discussing. And we do a lot more
[00:09:30] of that than I expected when I started, but then also giving and providing feedback on each other's
[00:09:39] writing helps crystallize and solidify what we like and don't like in other people's work. So the giving
[00:09:49] feedback is actually way more important than receiving feedback because it helps us to figure out,
[00:09:59] to train our brains to read critically, but not in a like negative kind of way more in a,
[00:10:06] what is the author trying to do here? Why is it, or isn't it working? How can I do this in my own work?
[00:10:13] And then the fifth thing is writing just a lot of writing. Yeah. So actually I'm really interested in the
[00:10:20] reading with a critical eye. So, um, so obviously when your writing group is sharing samples or
[00:10:27] potential chapters or whatever, you're, you're doing that, you're like setting out to do that
[00:10:30] when you're reading or listening to audiobooks. Um, uh, when you're reading anything now, do you find
[00:10:37] yourself always slipping into the critical eye or can you still read for pure enjoyment or
[00:10:40] is that a meaningful question? Um, it's a very meaningful question. I think, um, I have a
[00:10:46] background in teaching. I taught for four years and worked as a teacher's aide for four years before
[00:10:51] that. Um, and one thing that we did with reading, especially was we talked about close reading,
[00:10:58] about the process of reading something several times. I try to do that with, with some stories,
[00:11:05] but not all. And when I, when I set out to do that, I will read a story and I'll just blaze through it,
[00:11:12] having fun, not worrying about what I'm trying to learn. I'll comment like, this is cool. This is
[00:11:17] interesting. I don't understand what's happening here, but that's the extent of my comments.
[00:11:21] And then I can go back and turn on the, okay, what's the author trying to do here? I, and that helps
[00:11:29] understand, okay, um, Naomi Novik is setting up a character in Scrawlomance that's really sympathetic.
[00:11:37] You really understand what she's going through and what she's dealing with, but also to me,
[00:11:44] at least she's not very likable trying to figure out how Naomi Novik balances that. That's, that was
[00:11:51] a goal when I read that series was figuring out Elle's voice and why she can be so nasty to everybody
[00:12:02] around her and still be somebody I want to have win. Yeah. Yeah. Um, I guess how many questions like
[00:12:10] that can you focus on when you're doing a reread? So in that case, I think you could spend the
[00:12:15] entirety of Scrawlomance focusing on Elle, uh, or you could also look at, um, is it Orion? Yeah.
[00:12:21] The, yeah. So, so I think, I think Novik is doing very different things with those two characters and
[00:12:26] she's, she's subverting existing tropes, which we probably should talk about. Cause I mean,
[00:12:29] I think serialized fiction like lives or dies by tropes in general. I wonder, uh, can you focus on
[00:12:37] more than one of those sort of craft level questions in a reread? Um, can I, yes, should I? No. Um, the,
[00:12:50] the thing is there's so much going on in writing that's like, I, I don't see probably three quarters
[00:12:59] of what someone like Stephen King is doing at this point. I don't even see the levers he's pulling.
[00:13:04] Mm-hmm .
[00:13:05] So I can't understand how the machine works at all. But if I tried to focus on learning all of
[00:13:13] the skills all at once, it would be really messy. One thing my writing group tries to do, we bring in a
[00:13:20] lot of new authors and we try to expose them to one or two skills at a time because that way they can
[00:13:27] move from this, um, I don't know if you've seen the like wheel of competence thing. Yeah. Yeah.
[00:13:35] So they can move from unconscious incompetence to conscious competence where they understand the
[00:13:42] thing and they're using the thing, but they still have to think about the thing. And if, if they're
[00:13:47] doing that with 14 different skills all at once, or if I'm doing that with 14 different skills all at
[00:13:52] once, it's not going to, I'm not going to learn any of them well. So you need to learn. I think
[00:14:00] you need to learn one skill or two skills at a time. Gotcha. So, so you've been on Royal Road for
[00:14:07] about two years, a little more than two years, I think. About 20 months of writing time. Okay. Yeah.
[00:14:12] So, so, uh, what has your journey been like, uh, both before that and then on the platform?
[00:14:19] So when I started writing, I'd always kind of been a writer, but my writing had been more
[00:14:25] nonfiction history stuff. I got a degree in history from a local university out here. And while I was
[00:14:34] getting that bachelor's in history, I did a lot of like conference paper writing and presented a few
[00:14:41] conference papers at undergraduate history conferences. So prior to this, I understood how
[00:14:48] writing worked and how like sentence structure worked all of that, but writing fiction wasn't
[00:14:55] really a thing. But, um, during the pandemic and right after the pandemic, I found some of these
[00:15:03] stories on the slash slash HFY subreddit, um, which is a totally vulgar name that I probably can't repeat.
[00:15:13] Um, but it's about humanity being awesome and fighting aliens and being really cool,
[00:15:23] basically. But there were these really long space operas, like military space operas. And I
[00:15:28] started reading them there and that's how I found Royal Road, um, kind of fell into the
[00:15:35] more progression fantasy that RPG storylines from there. And then found a story called Dungeon Tour
[00:15:43] Guide by Aaron Shi. I was reading it and I said, I could probably write something like this. Um,
[00:15:51] I could not, it turned out.
[00:15:54] Well, at the time.
[00:15:55] Yeah. Um, so I started by like reading a whole bunch of stories on the site and figuring out what
[00:16:04] I wanted to try to write. It didn't go the way I wanted it to at all. And I thought like being a
[00:16:10] good writer was, I can create chapters that are more or less the same size that can end on a
[00:16:15] cliffhanger. So people want to read the next one. The story is more or less cohesive. That was kind of
[00:16:20] what I thought I was going to need to do. And I think I did okay at it, but I wasn't good at it.
[00:16:27] What do you think was missing and how you thought about it?
[00:16:31] I still haven't had any formal training at writing fiction. I haven't taken any classes on writing
[00:16:38] since like 2012 or something, even history classes. So it's been a while, but this writing group that I
[00:16:47] joined was, is really focused on the craft skills of writing less or more so than the marketing and
[00:16:57] like selling yourself side of things. And I think that just being exposed to an environment where
[00:17:04] I could start to see some of the pieces in writing really helped a lot.
[00:17:09] So now I'm a little more experienced and I'm thinking more about structural beats and
[00:17:14] a chapter's role within the story, how to maintain tension, all of those things. And it's, it's basically
[00:17:20] the same stuff I was focusing on 20 months ago, except I've got a vocabulary set now and a skill set now
[00:17:27] to understand what goes into making a story cohesive or what goes into making a character interesting
[00:17:36] that I didn't have before.
[00:17:38] Yeah. Interesting. Um, so, so I think that magical girl undergrad started out
[00:17:44] and it felt a little surface level, right? Um, and by the end it had developed into a much deeper
[00:17:52] sort of meditation on celebrity culture and, uh, colonialism to some extent and, and capitalism.
[00:17:59] Do you think that, uh, your earliest attempts where you were trying to imitate Dungeon Tour Guide,
[00:18:04] did you want to investigate those sorts of themes then or, or did that come later?
[00:18:10] I don't know. I think I just wanted to, at the time I just kind of wanted to write something and see if I
[00:18:16] could do it. And I, I did manage to get my first story to a completion point. I wasn't happy with the
[00:18:25] last 30,000 words or so, but it, it finished. So it was a real confidence booster that I could do it,
[00:18:33] but it wasn't until Metropole Girl undergrad that I started thinking about themes and goals and how to,
[00:18:42] how to talk about stuff like that. I knew that Rocco, Rocco is like the main
[00:18:50] TV producer villain type. I knew they were going to be the main villain, like from the beginning. And I knew I
[00:18:57] was going to be talking about show business and child actors and things like that from the beginning,
[00:19:05] but it wasn't really a focus until halfway through book two.
[00:19:11] Okay. Um, so are there specific skills and tools now in your toolbox, uh, that you developed with an eye
[00:19:20] towards being able to investigate those themes? Um, so, I mean, that, that's sort of a level beyond the
[00:19:26] thinking of cliffhangers at the end of chapters or, uh, character arcs to be satisfying need to have
[00:19:32] this sort of general structure or something like that. I don't, I don't think so. Theme is, um,
[00:19:41] I'm going to sound self-denigrating for a second. Lit RPG and progression fantasy is for the most part
[00:19:49] popcorn fiction. It's not usually trying to tell those big things. I don't think, I think there are
[00:19:57] authors that do, um, Matt Deniman's, um, Dungeon Crawler Carl switches from being like a power fantasy
[00:20:08] to being a, an anti-capitalist masterpiece somewhere in the third book. Yeah. Um, or he fights with
[00:20:17] monsters by shirt alone really wants to explore power and the good uses of bad power and the bad uses of
[00:20:28] good power. But I think a lot of authors in the Royal road space are thinking less about theme and more
[00:20:36] about hype. Um, producing those jaw dropping. That's really cool moments. Um, so I don't think theme is
[00:20:47] something I've deliberately focused on yet, but it's something that I am thinking about more as I get
[00:20:55] better at the other parts of writing. Right. So, so maybe as you develop your skills at the sort of nuts and
[00:21:04] bolts of the craft, it allows you to experiment at this, this secondary level. Uh, yeah. To go back
[00:21:10] to the cabinet metaphor, like once you can build a cabinet with nails and glue and a handsaw and
[00:21:18] a board and a ruler and it holds your cups up. Okay. Then you can start taking a router to the surface
[00:21:25] and start doing flowery patterns on it and do the edging to make it look cool, all of that stuff.
[00:21:32] But it requires those beginning skills to even have a surface to work on. I think.
[00:21:39] Yeah. Gotcha.
[00:21:40] Um, there, there are stories that I want to write that I can't write yet because I know I don't have
[00:21:45] those skills yet. Um, okay. So, uh, jumping back a little bit, we, we, we've mentioned tropes and I
[00:21:52] think that you're right on when you say a lot of lit RPG and progression fantasy is popcorn fiction. It's,
[00:21:57] uh, I mean, it's very similar to romance, right? So there are a lot of romance authors. I mean,
[00:22:03] there, there are romance authors who are doing amazing things with story and character and theme
[00:22:07] and exploring deep cruise about the world. And then there are the romance authors that turn out
[00:22:12] a book every two weeks. Um, and, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Um, I think part
[00:22:21] of what allows for that sort of dichotomy of deep, meaningful works and very surface level entertaining
[00:22:28] works is the sort of prevalence of tropes in, in the genre. So there are certain ways that things
[00:22:35] are known to work. So in, in a lot of closed door romances, so not spicy romances, like 60%
[00:22:40] away through the book, they kiss or something like that. And actually I would say that on,
[00:22:44] on a site like Royal road or any, any very publicly driven site where there's trending and their ratings
[00:22:53] and there are people, uh, promoting things to some extent, the more trophy you are, the,
[00:22:59] the better you're gonna do. Cause it's, it's what people expect. Um, how do you think about tropes in
[00:23:05] your work? Like when to use them straight, when to subvert, when to completely break away from the
[00:23:10] framework? Um, with magical girl undergrad, I was mostly trying to stick within the tropes a little
[00:23:19] bit more. It represents 15 months of my writing time from the point where I started planning how the
[00:23:25] system works to the time that I wrote the very end of it. So it's, it's a large chunk of time. Um,
[00:23:36] but I was trying to play the tropes relatively straight. I did a lot of reading in the superhero
[00:23:43] genre, especially with superhero lit RPGs, um, super supportive industrial strength, magic, um,
[00:23:51] magical girl gunslinger, um, super minion. Like I tried to have a really solid understanding of what the
[00:23:58] tropes were for a post worm, um, superhero lit RPG. Worm being the like iconic superhero lit RPG.
[00:24:11] Web fiction. Yeah.
[00:24:14] Trollblazer. Yeah.
[00:24:16] Yeah. Yeah. So it was like with that story, I wanted to stick to the tropes as much as I could
[00:24:21] with, um, the Halcyon system. I'm playing it a little less straight. I'm trying to position the
[00:24:28] main character more as a participant in the events and less as a driver of the events, so to speak.
[00:24:39] Um, she's caught up in things and she's, she's definitely powerful, but she's not
[00:24:47] like God to your powerful with an amazing cheat skill to begin with or anything.
[00:24:52] Yeah.
[00:24:53] And then with my, my new project, that's not out yet, but hopefully we'll be in the next three or
[00:25:01] four months. I'm playing the tropes extremely straight. I'm writing a system apocalypse story,
[00:25:08] which has certain beats that you, you kind of need to hit. It's similar to romance in that regard,
[00:25:14] where if you don't have the 60% kiss or the 65 to 80% fake, fake breakup or like whatever,
[00:25:25] then you're not going to, the audience is not going to accept that.
[00:25:29] Right. They're going to think something is wrong as opposed to, yeah.
[00:25:34] Yeah. They're going to feel like their expectations aren't being met.
[00:25:37] Yeah. So I guess I wonder what are the skills around working with tropes, right? So there's clearly
[00:25:44] the knowledge of what, what tropes are expected and, and which are sort of like secondary, I guess,
[00:25:48] that you can abandon without harm. I wonder, I wonder how you could practice subverting tropes.
[00:25:56] It feels like it would be really risky to do that with your main story on a major site.
[00:26:02] I guess, I guess maybe short stories or something.
[00:26:04] Yeah. Yeah. Um, short stories are really good for that.
[00:26:07] Yeah. Royal road hosts a short story. Well, it's not a short story competition, but I'm slowly
[00:26:14] turning it into a short story competition. Um, it's the Royal road community magazine contest
[00:26:20] and it's supposed to be like one month of writing the first or second of the month. One of the community
[00:26:29] members tells everybody what the prompt is going to be. And then everybody writes to that prompt.
[00:26:35] So in June, which was the last one, the prompt was about goblins and grandmas.
[00:26:42] That was the whole prompt. And so everybody was trying to support the trope, um, which was going to be
[00:26:47] like, Oh, goblins are terrifying monsters and grandma's terrified of them, blah, blah, blah.
[00:26:51] Yeah. So they all wrote like grandma invites the goblins in and becomes their grandmother,
[00:26:57] stuff like that. And I,
[00:26:59] Yeah. And I was like, okay, how can I subvert the subversion of the trope? And so I wrote a story
[00:27:07] about an ancient paladin grandma who is still serving her God, even though she was no longer at
[00:27:12] the peak of her powers. So her God had her going to fight goblins again, even though she had killed
[00:27:17] the demon King when she was like 30. And I wanted to explore like how swearing an oath to a God or goddess
[00:27:26] is not like a, a one-time thing. It's not something that ever stops.
[00:27:32] Yeah. Yeah.
[00:27:33] You're done when you can no longer serve. So I ended up because I was only writing about 8,000,
[00:27:41] 9,000 words. I, I got to play around with the trope of goblins being the evil monsters and grandmas
[00:27:48] being weak, but also with the subversion of that trope, the cozy goblin grandma story.
[00:27:54] Mm-hmm .
[00:27:57] Yeah. So I think in, in practice in general, one of the important things is being able to lower the
[00:28:04] stakes from performance, right? So you can try things that would not be practical for, for, you know,
[00:28:10] sometimes like health reasons. And so in a, in a, like the community magazine, uh, you are not risking
[00:28:17] your overall rating and your reputation on the site for this short story, which makes me wonder,
[00:28:22] like, what are the other ways to lower the stakes in, in working on writing? So sharing with a select
[00:28:27] group, your, your online writing group, uh, and having beta readers, which is huge on AO3. Um,
[00:28:33] Yeah. Uh, are there other ways that you can think of or that you use?
[00:28:37] Yeah. Um, so Royal Road is actually, um, is actually one of those things because the goal is to,
[00:28:45] for me at least the goal is to get to Kindle and Audible. Um, the goal is to be published on there
[00:28:52] because I'm trying to make this a career at some point. Sure. I'm, I'm on my way, but the goal is
[00:28:59] to get published there. Royal Road is a much safer place where I can get a lot of feedback if I want it
[00:29:05] or block the feedback if I don't want it. Um, but it's a, it's a lower stakes environment than
[00:29:13] publishing on Kindle or Audible and publishing on Kindle and Audible is a lower stakes environment than
[00:29:22] reaching out to an agent and having that agent query one of the big five publishing houses.
[00:29:28] So like right now I'm operating at a lower stakes environment than I could be,
[00:29:33] but even lower than that, I run the crit groups on for the council of the eternal hiatus, which is the
[00:29:40] writing group I'm in. Okay. Um, I do the administrative side of it mostly, and we create a low stakes
[00:29:47] environment where there's three or four people in a group and they read a chapter to a week and give
[00:29:54] feedback on it. And it creates that lower stakes environment that you're talking about.
[00:30:00] And that goes all the way down to, I shared this story with a friend and he gave me feedback on it.
[00:30:06] So there's all of these different like levels of environments.
[00:30:09] Sure. Yeah. And anyone can potentially be practiced for another.
[00:30:14] Possibly. Yeah. Yeah. So like I said earlier, I don't think there's a meaningful difference between
[00:30:20] like practice and performance with writing. And I know you ask that question.
[00:30:24] Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And I, and I, and for, I think a surprising number of fields, that's the answer I get.
[00:30:30] Um, when you are doing the thing, you are necessarily practicing the thing, uh, which I coming into all of
[00:30:37] these conversations, I think sort of surprised me because I think for something to be the most
[00:30:45] actually saying this makes me realize why I'm surprised for something to be the most effective
[00:30:49] practice it can be. I think the goal of the effort needs to be improvement and for something to be
[00:30:55] the most effective performance can be, it is the production of some performance, right? So in writing,
[00:30:59] it's the production of a work that people will enjoy in music. It's the performance of a piece,
[00:31:03] um, in chess, it's the execution of a game. Uh, but the goal is not improvement. It's the production
[00:31:08] of the thing. And so in the back of my mind, I'm always thinking that at least theoretically,
[00:31:14] there should be a difference between I am doing an activity to get better at the activity versus
[00:31:18] I'm doing an activity to produce the thing. Um, and maybe it is just that some domains don't admit
[00:31:25] of that distinction, that there is no way to practice the underlying skills meaningfully or usefully
[00:31:31] or effectively without actually producing a thing at the end. Um, so I think with writing, um, going back
[00:31:40] to the short stories and the community magazine contest, those were opportunities for me to practice
[00:31:46] skills. And, um, with Louie body, which was semi-biographical about my grandpa and Alzheimer's,
[00:31:54] that story was about dealing with an emotional situation that there wasn't a, a possible victory
[00:32:03] for. It was about exploring tragedy. It was about, it was about writing from a male character's
[00:32:10] perspective because I tend to write female characters. Like those were the practice skills
[00:32:14] I was working on, but it was also an opportunity to relatively quickly create a
[00:32:21] very polished story with a specific emotional goal. And that was to make the judges cry. So that became
[00:32:31] the performance aspect of it was the final product will be a tragedy. It will make the judges feel things
[00:32:39] and it filled both roles that way, both as a learning opportunity and as a performance.
[00:32:47] Great. Yeah. Thank you. Well, thank you so much. This has been a really great discussion and I'm glad
[00:32:53] we got the chance to talk. Yeah, it was fun. I'm glad it worked out.
[00:33:01] And that's it for this week on 10,000. Thanks again to Chris Heyshen for the conversation
[00:33:05] and thanks to you for listening. We'll be back soon with another interview.
[00:33:08] Thank you.
[00:33:08] Thank you.
